The Vertigo Zoom or: How I learned to fall into an infinite abyss while standing perfectly still

August 27th, 2007 | by Gautam |

We’ve previously seen how master cinematographic techniques have ended up as cheap parlour tricks in the case of the ill-fated Dutch Angle (insert collective nod here). In the very same way, another case arises: The Vertigo Zoom. We’ve all seen one too many of those slasher films where the helpless victim is cornered and the dreadful zombie with the chainsaw is about to rip her into two symmetrical halves and she lets out a hypersonic scream to the effect where it seems like her background is falling away from her. That’s right, that falling away from oneself effect is what we call the ‘Vertigo Zoom’.

There has been some amount of speculation over the name of this particular effect. Some say the effect is named so because of the feeling of vertigo that it creates. But clearly the origin of the name can be traced back to Alfred Hitchcock’s ‘Vertigo’ (1958) which was the first instance where this effect was used. The effect was first constructed and executed for Hitchcock by cameraman Irmin Roberts. The effect is also known as: Dolly Zoom, Hitchcock Zoom, Vertigo Effect, Zolly, Zido, Telescoping, Contra Zoom, Trombone Shot or Push/Pull Effect. Technically, the effect is known as Track in/ Zoom out or Zoom in/ Dolly out.

What it represents

The Vertigo Zoom is used to depict a sense of extreme emotion. It represents a sudden rush of adrenalin much like what you feel when you’re bungee jumping or doing heroin. On the same lines as the Dutch Angle, the Vertigo Zoom is a cinematic depiction of a highly psychological feeling. The most common usage of this effect is in Horror/ Slasher films or films about drug abuse.

The perfect example of a film that employs the services of the Vertigo Zoom is Steven Spielberg’s ‘Jaws’ (1975). Other films include Event Horizon (1997), Poltergeist (1982), Pulp Fiction (1994), Goodfellas (1990) and The Quick and the Dead (1994).

The execution

For a fancy effect, The Vertigo Zoom is relatively very easy to execute. It is actually a simple scientific trick. There can be two types of the Vertigo Zoom: a feeling of falling away from the backdrop or a falling into it. Both are just reversals of each other.

The camera starts at a distance from the subject with the lens completely zoomed in. This is the start point. From here, when the shot begins, the camera tracks into the subject and at the same time the lens is zoomed out relatively so that the subject in the foreground remains the same size. This causes the backdrop to increase in depth of field as the lens is zoomed out causing a sense of gaining distance between the subject and the backdrop. This is the Track in/ Zoom out method where it feels like the subject is falling away from the backdrop.

The opposite of this is the Zoom in/ Dolly out. In this variation, the camera starts very close to the subject while completely zoomed out. Once the shot begins, the camera starts to dolly out away from the subject while zooming in relatively. This gives a feeling as if the subject is growing closer or falling into the backdrop.

Another less popular and rarely tried variation is with the side tracking shot. The camera moves from Subject A to Subject B while zooming in or out.

From creative to cliché

As with the Dutch Angle, this effect lost its way after its initial crusades in the great cinema of the 1950s and 1960s. After Hitchcock, other great directors did use it in the right amounts to their artistic advantage. Great names like Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, Steven Soderbergh and Quentin Tarantino have all used The Vertigo Zoom in more than one of their films.

It was once again the B-movie market that ruined the reputation of the Vertigo Zoom as a serious effect. Many exploitation films of the 1970s and 1980s and especially slasher films over-used the effect and turned it into a cheesy little joke. This phenomenon prevailed throughout the direct-to-video market of the 1990s and continues today in several direct-to-DVD and other C-movies.

Vertigo Zoom + Dutch Angle = Suicidal Combination

When combined with the other equally inglorious camera trick: the Dutch Angle, it forms a lethal combination for serious filmmakers much like ground beef and a tall glass of milk for vegans. The Dutch Angle puts forward a sense of psychological imbalance and The Vertigo Zoom builds up a sense of rush. The resulting feeling of this combination can only be left to imagination.

Although Tarantino used this deadly combination to his advantage in Kill Bill volume 1 (2003), it was more of an intended homage to B-movies than a serious depiction of the feeling of the shot. Another filmmaker who used this combination very well in recent times was Terry Gilliam in his film Tideland (2005).

In Zooming out

A valuable lesson that one can learn from the respective ill-fates of both the Dutch Angle and the Vertigo Zoom is that the obvious over-use of any effect will send out a very bad message. Critics and especially the audience have seen one too many of these cheap tricks and when over-used they are quick to brand your film as a cliché. In saying that it does not mean that one should not use these effects. After all, these are the scientific parameters of the camera and as long as you’re using the camera, you will have to work with these parameters.

One valuable suggestion that I’ve been given, which I would like to share with you is, try not to do anything with the camera that the human eye cannot do. But in case of depicting highly unrealistic psychological shots, I don’t see why not. Hell, go with the Vertigo Zoom.

Here is an interesting compilation of scences from films that use The Vertigo Zoom:

2 Responses to “The Vertigo Zoom or: How I learned to fall into an infinite abyss while standing perfectly still”

  1. By Alex C on Jul 16, 2009

    http://www.indianauteur.com/3_may_The%20Vertigo%20Zoom%20and%20Death%20of%20the%20Dutch%20Angle%20.php

    Hope this doesn’t read as spam, but in Googling the scene you mentioned from Kill Bill, I just so happened across this website which seems to have ripped this article…figured you’d like a heads-up!

  2. By Alex C on Jul 16, 2009

    Okay, you can delete these. I stupidly didn’t check the author’s byline…sorry for wasting your time!

Post a Comment

- Why ask? This confirms you are a human user!